🔗 Share this article

"Half of my personal history is archived on Snapchat, and unexpectedly they demand us to cover the cost for it."

Negative ratings and a feeling of injustice have dominated social media conversations since the messaging service emerged as the most recent digital platform to introduce fees for a service that people previously accessed for at no cost.

Snap revealed in the fall that it would begin imposing fees users if they have more than five gigabytes worth of archived images and clips stored as Snapchat Memories.

Among numerous users, these retro posts function as a portal to bygone days – leading some to accuse the firm of "profit-driven motives" in posts on social media and poor feedback on Google and Apple's app stores.

Alternative Options

Snap has compared its subscription options to those provided by tech giants for smartphones.

As another possibility for individuals avoiding fees, subscribers have the ability to export their Memories – which for many people cover large volumes – to their own hardware.

Snap stated that only a minority of members would be affected by the changes.

The company admitted that it was "always challenging to transition from using a feature without cost to covering the expense" – but suggested it would be "a valuable investment" for members.

Many opposing the change via digital channels seem to disagree.

Public Outcry

An online petition called the cost a "memory tax", with participants describing it "dystopian" and "absurd" – while one person vowed to abandon the app again.

At the same time, in a poor review on the Google Play store, a individual calling themselves Natacha Jonsson said it felt "very unethical".

"As a member of that generation, many people have extensive archives of memories on this service," they commented. "Numerous users only kept the app primarily for that reason. 5GB is absolutely nothing when you have years worth of moments... Bye Snap."

Furthermore, a journalism student, a young adult journalism student in London, posted on the video platform her plans to remove the application.

"I made up my mind that I wanted to export all my archived media as soon as I could," she stated. "Almost all of my teenage years have been recorded through my Snapchat memories, all of the photos in there are extremely valuable to me."

"The decision appears unreasonable to introduce fees people for something that has been at no cost for such a long time."

Unspecified Pricing

The company has not disclosed how much premium options would cost in the United Kingdom – only that they are part of a "gradual global rollout".

Yet a young adult Amber Daley, who also lives in London, commented in a video on the video service that she would be "devastated" by the new costs.

The user noted that the service had become "integrated into daily routine" since she first joined in 2014.

While she said she understood the service needed to make money, Amber suggested that the Memories feature is more valuable than the company may have anticipated.

"In my opinion it's a somewhat inequitable move to demand payment from your subscribers who have been loyal and devoted," she said. "This feature is more than a name, these are our genuine personal moments."

Expert Analysis

Firms opting to impose fees from subscribers for a service that was previously free is a frequent occurrence, and numerous people cover the cost of options like iCloud and Google Drive to save their media content from their smartphone.

The truth of archiving content in the digital storage – which some in the technology sector like to refer to as merely "an external server" – is that it requires funding.

"Hosting trillions of archived media on the platform requires significant resources," social media consultant Matt Navarra stated. "The company has to attempt to identify a approach to offset the expenses of archiving, bandwidth, back-ups, content delivery, encryption – the entire process."

However the consultant said that introducing fees for a function that had earlier required no payment, and subscribers had been invited to access as such, may seem like a "bait and switch" for many people.

"Altering the terms after people have created this huge digital archive seems unfair," he explained. For numerous users, he stated, "Saved content is more than stored files, they're sentimental records."

The opinion was echoed by those leaving unfavorable comments, with an individual labeling their archived media "the most precious thing to me".

"[Memories] have each part of my experiences within them from happy occasions such as new additions, sad moments of loss, memories with friends/family, [and] my whole teenage years," they commented.

Expert Analysis

An academic expert, a postdoctoral researcher at an educational establishment in the the Low Countries, said that Snapchat's move highlights the implications of business-oriented apps being used to store meaningful individual recordings.

"Platforms gain from this trust, interdependence, and presumption of never-ending access, which even incentivises many people to stay on the service or keep accessing it in order to revisit their stored media," she told journalists. "But these are not benevolent guardians of personal memory."