🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed ruling, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a newly configured congressional district plan that may create as many as five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three decision, issued on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to set aside a lower court's ruling that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Explanation

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and disrupting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its action.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to use the maps drawn after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Stinging Opposition

With a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, noting that its decision was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a infraction of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The court's action comes amid a countrywide fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican control. Usually, redistricting happens after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of more conservative seats. Democrats, for their part, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State AG praised the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes favorable to his party. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

In contrast, opposition party leaders lamented the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

A top Democratic leader said the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by approving a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.