🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are exploring similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that phones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an similar ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to pass a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised families to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," said a leading MEP driving the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the administration has kept open a future ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in strong research".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have raised apprehensions. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who died after being exposed to harmful social media material contends that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, action is mostly unfolding at the local level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from certain politicians to follow this example, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Outside of the West, other nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations strike a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The body highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

While this worldwide conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers show that policymakers around the world are increasingly willing to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.